Transatlantic Trends Survey, 2011

Resource Information

The work Transatlantic Trends Survey, 2011 represents a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in Bowdoin College Library. This resource is a combination of several types including: Work, Language Material, Books.

Label

Transatlantic Trends Survey, 2011

Creator

• Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]
• Kennedy, Craig

Contributor

• Isernia, Pierangelo
• Everts, Philip
• Eichenberg, Richard
• Nyiri, Zsolt

Author

• Eichenberg, Richard
• Everts, Philip
• Kennedy, Craig
• Isernia, Pierangelo
• Nyiri, Zsolt

Contributor

• Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]

Subject

• Middle East
• NATO
• North Atlantic Treaty Organization
• Obama, Barack
• Party affiliation
• authority
• democracy
• economic aid
• economic crises
• economic sanctions
• elections
• euro
• foreign policy
• government performance
• government spending
• international conflict
• international cooperation
• international relations
• leadership
• military intervention
• military strength
• national defense
• national politics
• national security
• nuclear weapons
• political affiliation
• political partisanship
• public opinion
• Afghanistan War
• religious behavior
• revolutions
• social attitudes
• survey
• terrorism
• voter attitudes
• voting behavior
• war
• religious affiliation
• Arab Israeli conflict
• Economic assistance
• European Union
• European unification
• Expenditures, Public
• International relations
• Intervention (International law)

Genre

• survey

Summary

The aim of this survey was to identify the attitudes of the public in the United States and in 13 European countries towards foreign policy and transatlantic issues. This survey concentrated on issues such as: United States and European Union (EU) leadership and relations, international relations, assessment of the current United States President on various issues such as the United States economy and combating international terrorism, and respondents' view of countries such as the United States, China, Russia, Brazil, and Japan. Respondents were also asked whether NATO was still essential, if they agreed with NATO's assertion that countries should maintain or increase defense spending, if the European Union and United States had enough common interests to cooperate on international issues and whether their relationship should become closer or be more independent, and if their own government should increase or decrease spending for defense. Respondents were also questioned on whether they were optimistic or pessimistic on issues such as stabilizing the situations in Afghanistan and Libya, their level of concern over Iran possibly developing nuclear weapons, and how to put an end to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Respondents were further queried about the role of the European Union and the United States in establishing democracy in other nations, whether they approved of their own country intervening to establish democracy in other nations, what countries were of most importance to their own nation's interests, the rise of China as a world power, the prospect of Turkey's membership in the European Union and possible consequences stemming from their joining, the state of the euro, and how much authority the EU should exercise over member nations. Lastly, respondents were asked how they were personally affected by the economic crisis, the importance of economic versus military power, their voting intentions in national elections, and how closely they followed world affairs. Demographic and other background information includes age, gender, political affiliation and partisanship, religion, race, age when finished full-time education and stage at which full-time education completed, occupation, type of phone line, household composition, type of locality, and region of residence